WordBiz
Report
Are Long Copy
Salesletters Scams?
By Michel Forten
Contributing Writer
| Pub Note: the guru is Seth Godin and his comment was in response to my blog posting about Instant Audio, aka AudioGenerator, a Web-based tool for adding audio clips to your site or emails. - DW |
I love a good debate, because it ignites passion, provides insights and shows some very interesting clues to the way people think - and feel.
Which is the very
point I'm bringing up with the issue of long or emotionally charged copy.
Before we begin, let me remind you of an immutable truth...
Copywriting is "salesmanship in print."
And that hasn't changed since former Canadian policeman John E. Kennedy changed
the face of advertising forever with those three words in 1905. (Selling has
been around since the beginning of time. As sales trainer Zig Ziglar once noted,
selling is the oldest profession in the world. Not that "other" job.)
Because long copy is exactly that: a printed form of a sales presentation. Every
question, every handled objection, every attempt to close the sale, all the
way to asking for the order, are elements that are applied in long copy salesletters.
Copywriter Paul Myers made a wonderful point: "Your copy needs to be as long
as is needed to make the sale, and not one paragraph more."
Gary Halbert once remarked: "There's no such thing as copy that's 'too long'
but copy that's 'too boring'." In other words, if the copy seems too long, it's
probably not because of the length, but rather, because at some point it started
to bore you.
But the best advice on this comes from Dan Kennedy...
| The person
who says 'I would never read all that copy' makes the mistake of thinking
they are the customer. And they're not. We are never our own customers.
There's a thing I teach called 'message-to-market match'. It is this: when
your message is matched to a target market that has a high level of interest
in it, not only does responsiveness go up but readership goes up, too. The
whole issue of interest goes up. The truth about long copy is that, first of all, there's abundant, legitimate, statistical, split-testing research to indicate that virtually without exception, long copy outperforms short copy. Some significant research has been done that indicates that readership falls off dramatically at 300 words but does not again drop off until 3,000 words. |
The conclusion you can draw from that is this: If they're NOT targeted from
the "get-go," they won't read 50 words much less 5,000. (This is excerpted from
an interview. I urge you to go to http://dankennedy.com/paulson.html
for the entire interview.)
If they are targeted and genuinely interested in what you have to offer, then
they're going to want more information about it, not less. And that is the key
- because the debate really boils down to three important issues:
1. Market.
2. Objective.
3. Results.
Respectively, in that order.
1. The Market
The approach you take (long or short, instutional or direct response, and hypey
or toned-down) depends on the product and the offer (such as the price, among
others), because both depend on something more important: the audience.
Long copy does outperform short copy in almost every case. But I do say "almost."
Different audiences warrant different types of approaches. In a handful of cases,
shorter copy is best. It's all about targeting your market.
Target marketing will tell you everything you need to know about how to write
your copy. A common obstacle I see is when business owners are too "married"
to their products and write copy for their products (or themselves) instead
of their audiences.
Second, if your message is not targeted to the right audience, no matter how
long or short the copy is, no matter how emotionally charged or highbrow the
language is, and no matter how innovative or poor the product is ...
The copy won't sell. Period.
Find out who your market is. If you have more than one, I also submit that you
should have a different salesletter directed at each different market - it's
market segmentation, pure and simple. Even if it's the same product.
As the saying goes, "Different strokes for different folks."
2. The Objective
The approach itself will be based on the objective of the copy. Personally,
I love direct marketing (whether it's a long copy > salesletter, a direct mail
piece or an infomercial) specifically because it's measurable, quantifiable
and immediate. It's one in which you ask for the order outright.
Or one in which you directly ask the reader to do something. Anything.
It's different if you wanted to use institutional advertising in order to build
the brand of your product, penetrate a new market or create top-of-mind awareness
- and not attempting to sell and generate orders on the spot.
Some people choose institutional advertising over direct response advertising.
That is, short, pithy, clever copy, with a lot of whitespace, corporate logo
and highfalutin language. No phone number. No address. No selling.
And no urgency.
That's fine, but this will require a massive advertising budget, a lot of repetition
and a ton of patience before knowing if the approach works. But if it does (and
once it does), orders will start pouring in. Still, it's very risky at best.
Nevertheless, the question is, what is the copy's goal? Think about this. Is
it to educate and inform? To build a brand and penetrate a new market?
Or to make an offer and SELL?
3. The Results
You will approach each market differently. And the language, and particularly
the offer, must fit THAT specific market. Again, it depends on #1 and
#2.
For example, do you use hyperbole, emotions and even "used-car" vernacular to
make your pitch? Maybe. Maybe not. But consider this: while the language may
or may not be hypey, "go to the court of last resort," as Claude Hopkins said.
That's "the buyers of your product." And that's the key: testing.
If the language is indeed turning them off and causing them NOT to buy, that's
what's important. Again, your audience will ultimately dictate your approach.
Is it too hypey? Too cheesy? Too "scammy?" If so, how do you know? Aside from
your market and objective, the language and approach you choose depends on your
offer. But more important, it depends on the results your offer creates.
Whether the reader likes the language or not is not the issue: if the language
makes the sale, that's the true test. In the end, your prospects will
cast their votes on your copy not with their opinions or feedback but with their
wallets.
Projecting a professional, poised and credible image doesn't mean you can't
be emotional in your pitch. You can still fire up hormones and press hot buttons
and stir emotions - without appearing cheesy, overbearing or downright crude.
People buy on emotion first and justify their decision with logic. Even engineers,
C-level executives and politicians.
Some final words.
Don't go on long-winded tangents, and don't add copy just for the sake of making
it long. Keep your eyes on the prize. Stick with the sale. Be relevant. Make
your case, tell your story and provide as much information as is needed to make
the sale ... And not one word more.
Because the bottom line is this: the length and tone of your copy is dictated
not by what you think, and not by what a copywriter or advertising agency thinks,
but by your audience, your objective and, above all, your results.
Michel Fortin is a direct response
copywriter and consultant dedicated to turning sales messages into powerful
magnets. Get a free copy of his popular e-book, "The 10 Commandments of Power
Positioning," when you subscribe to his free monthly ezine, The
Profit Pill.
Reprinted with permission.
WordBiz.com,
Inc.
P.O. Box 3766
Washington DC 20027
+1 202.333.2022 land
+1 202.255.1467 mobile
debbie.weil@gmail.com
www.wordbiz.com